Reference library
Lessons from the Trenches on Reproducible Evaluation of Language Models
Paper summary
Documents methodological problems in language-model evaluation, including setup sensitivity, inconsistent comparisons, and weak reproducibility. Experience with the evaluation harness motivates concrete reporting and comparison practices.
Relevance to the project
A reference for fixing configurations, seeds, metrics, versions, and comparison conditions in simulation research as well as optional LLM work.
A common harness does not eliminate flawed tasks or contaminated evidence.
Source record
- Reference ID
- lm-eval
- Archived version
- 2405.14782v3
- Summary provenance
- reference-library/papers/lm-eval/metadata.json · summary
- Review status
- initial orientation summary; not a critical full-paper review
- Reading scope
- Selected abstract/opening and available closing discussion/conclusion passages in the preserved text extract; broader project notes provide context. No reproduction of experiments, exhaustive methods review, or equation/figure audit.